Nathan (gemsling) wrote,

Rant: Limit email size to facilitate document sharing

Like most people here, I'm irritated by the 100 Mb limit on mail storage on the Exchange Server. But I'd readily support a limit on message size. Let's say 100 Kb. That should be enough to allow most formatted email through, but not large attachments.

Yes, it would feel restrictive at first, but it would force someone to build a solution for allowing documents to be shared company-wide.

You guessed it, this rant is about the stupidity of restricting access to documents, not the woes of attachments. Well, it's both really. I shouldn't need to receive extra copies of one attachment just because my project manager includes me on an email asking others to provide feedback. But what else can she do? If she puts the document on a shared drive or document repository, access control will prevennt some people from getting to it. So, everyone continues to email attachments. What a waste.

EDIT: I vote we name our installation of SharePoint "BlockPoint" to highlight the way we're limiting its functionality.
Tags: gripe, work

  • CTTS: Nuki Nuki (Nookie?)

    The kids were playing around on YouTube today, and all of a sudden I heard this vibrant pop song playing (of the same ilk as the Crazy Frog), with…

  • CTTS: Sex in the mouths of babes

    "Let's do it like they do on the Discovery channel," sang the kids, loudly, as we wandered around the winery. That's what I get for playing The…

  • Poor Josh: Martians and girls

    Martians I played The War Of The Worlds for the kids this morning. (Specifically Jeff Wayne's musical version thereof.) Josh in particular got…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment