Nathan (gemsling) wrote,

My attempt to elucidate the problems with call centre technologies

Somewhere, lying on a beach in the Bahamas, is the NLSR sales rep who managed to convince some misguided change guru at AAPT to implement Natural Language Speech Recognition on its phone queues.

Pressing buttons is standard practice. "If you're calling about a fault, press 2." I'm fine with that. Enough questions and I should be able to get through to the right team, with my customer details already on the screen.

But speech recognition? Ugh.

"I can understand what you say."

Stress levels rising. I've just been pressing buttons. Why can't I keep doing that? If the question's simple enough, buttons are just as good. If the question's complex, how will I know what to say and how will you know what I've said?

"Are you calling about a sales enquiry, a billing or payment enquiry, or support for your AAPT service?"

Do I really have to embarrass myself by talking to a machine? What if I don't say it right and you tell me to repeat it, or put me through to the wrong queue? What if your test group had Australian, Kiwi, Indian and Japanese accents, but I have a broad Scottish accent?

"Do you need to report a fault, are you moving, do you need additional lines, or do you have a general enquiry?"

Do I say "fault" in a monotone voice and hope I don't get transferred to Billing like the first time I tried this? Or do I say "report a fault", or "I need to report a fault"?

"Please say your AAPT phone number."

With or without area code? How fast or slow do I need to speak for the speech recognition to work? If it doesn't work, will I have to keep saying it, or is an operator going to listen to a recording of what I've said and type it in, all the while laughing at my stilted speech and broad Scottish accent?

In summary: I've never met anyone who has liked an NLSR system, and I highly doubt it worth the money that AAPT spent on it (over and above the cost of building an equivalent keypad based IVR).

Yes, I've probably written about this before. Either this or my other phone queue gripe: interrupting music with messages. A customised hold track that seamlessly integrates music and company messages is good. But playing music and interrupting it with messages is bad. Here's why:

It's stressful: The music stops, there's a click, a human voice... I've got to be alert and get ready to talk to the operator. Oh, it's just a message. Repeat every 30 seconds.

It's negative: Your words tell me that my call is important and that you're sorry for the delay, but all you're really doing is reminding me that I'm still on hold. Recorded messages, especially when they're clichéd or use weasel words, can easily come across as insincere.

Combined with the regular disappointment of thinking I've got through when I haven't (see above), that's a whole lot of negative. Just let me chill out and listen to the music, and wake me from the trance when you can actually help me.

That is all. I wonder if I can get this into a business or call centre trade mag somewhere...
Tags: gripe, rant, tech

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded