Nathan (gemsling) wrote,
Nathan
gemsling

RFC 3675 - .sex Considered Dangerous

Every now and then, an RFC is published that catches my eye. Today, it is:
Donald Eastlake 3rd's reply to all those nuts who believe you can mandate that all "adult" material be located under an easily identifiable and filterable top level domain such as .sex, without facing any technical, legal, or moral problems...
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment